Google launched Google+ (their long-awaited social network) on Tuesday and, whereas everybody else appears to be asking "Will it kill Facebook?", it got me pondering a general positive trend in social media.
Part of the Google Plus project is that the +1 button for websites and pages that is billed as kind of like Facebook's 'Like' and 'Recommend' choices. Hitting the button on a selected page can, in Google's own words, say "this is pretty cool" or "you ought to check this out".
Notable by its absence is that the counterbalancing choice -- Google are giving us Google Plus -- what of Google Minus?
It's a similar question that that has been asked on Facebook for years -- "Where's the 'dislike' button?" there is even a three million robust Facebook page dedicated to that terribly question.
Looking at different well used social networking services you will see the same story. Twitter has favourites, Tumblr has liking -- heck, even thuscially influenced reality tv shows like X issue are created so viewer vote for the individuals they need to succeed instead of those they need to be eliminated.
The negative choice appears to be changing into outdated. Older social recommendation sites like Digg and StumbleUpon still have their own versions of negative feedback however in each cases they don't seem to be as outstanding because the positive. StumbleUpon's thumbs down could be a physically smaller button on the toolbar and is missing the text that goes with the thumbs up. Digg really got rid of their 'bury' operate for a jiffy as a result of abuses however then reinstated it. At this moment is sits a distance far from the positive choice and is much less outstanding.
So what is this positivity trend about?
I think it is the results of 2 main things:
One is that the net, for all its glory, could be a place where anonymity typically breeds negativity. It's all too simple to kind out a spiteful comment as a result of you'll nearly never see or have to be compelled to handle the results of that remark. The human association that stops lots of callous real-world spite is missing.
Looking at the comments on sites may be quite the education (depending on the extent of moderation) with commenters additional possible to be moved to comment negatively than absolutely.
Even when the comments are additional balanced, the negative is usually additional extreme and additional personal. Comments regarding the writer's personal look, concerns them to be fired or to urge a correct job kind a distinction with the positive that tend towards the so much less emotionally charged "I enjoyed the article" model.
Bearing this in mind, why introduce a button to fan the flames? Why would Facebook introduce a mechanism to enable bullying? Why would a news website introduce a technique of undermining its staff? Why would a blogging platform build during a casual smackdown option? the purpose is to encourage communication -- what higher thanks to ruin that than to admit via the interface that its users' content may be worthless?
The second is that the number of content on-line is increasing at some astronomical rate.
Anyone with a stable association will produce one thing on the net. and that they do -- as evidenced by the proliferation of blogs, personal websites, home businesses, Twitter accounts and thus on.
But not most are a genius and not every bit of content created by an excellent content creator are going to be a sparkling tour de force.
What this suggests is that the {good|the nice} and therefore the good and therefore the fascinating are floating regarding within the swirling morass of content that Google is making an attempt to organise and create searchable. after you begin thinking in terms of Google Plus in terms of search, a and while not a Minus starts to form additional sense. Google has determined that the content we wish to ascertain is that the stuff that's relevant, well written and fascinating to others -- i.e. what we have a tendency to expect from the things on the primary page of Google search results.
What solely giving a positive choice will is tacitly acknowledge the actual fact that the net contains lots of middling content and then raise its users to elevate the nice from the remainder.
No comments:
Post a Comment